Is intelligence endowed from birth?
Is ‘smartness’ determined by nature? If so, as in the proverb “An onion will not produce a rose,” a superior family will produce a superior child and a not so superior family, a not so superior child. The proverb illustrates the notion that heredity will play a major role in deciding a child’s smartness. This has been one of the greatest concerns of educators and parents alike.
What actually affects the intelligence of a child? Currently, environmental factors are weighed more heavily than heredity in detecting a child’s intelligence. The fact that a newborn baby has a prenatal memory, and that he can understand what is going on around him during birth, and can save this information into his memory, are seen as major discoveries of the latter half of the 20th century.
The discovery that a fetus is conscious, and possesses intelligence and memory, has led to the notion of ‘Taikyo’, or prenatal training of the unborn child. In Asia, Taikyo or unborn child education has been accepted for over three thousand years.
These facts show, at least vaguely, that the smartness of a child is not strictly hereditary but depends on how he is being raised. What would parents do if they found that their child could be raised to be smart depending on the environment and education he is to receive? This is contrary to the notion that being smart or not is hereditary and that they as parents can do nothing about it. If they can influence the outcome, would they not find great hope in education?
Look out for more in the site after a month’s time in the ‘intelligent parenting’ section.














